Internet security company Cloudflare estimates that the proportion of web traffic driven by AI bots is now greater than that from humans. It says automated traffic crossed the 50% measured in June 2026 and now accounts were nearly 58% of all webpage requests.
Source: Private Eye August 2026. Issue number 1681.
Reuters obtained internal Meta data on what happened after Zuckerberg cut 8,000 workers and moved 7,000 into AI roles. AI-generated code changes jumped 220%. New features reaching users only rose 36%. Major incidents spiked 40%. Time spent firefighting those incidents up 70%. Employee sentiment dropped from 74% to 55% favorable. Hours before the first round of layoffs went out, Zuckerberg quietly cancelled the second round that was planned for November.
Hedgie@hedgieMarkets
This is an odd one that I'm going to put down to perhaps being a bit lazy [reusing an add originally developed for an EU country, and/or poor copy editing before it was released.
First off, the email image quotes prices in euros [I'm in the UK, we use pounds]. Hmmm, I thought, that might be a problem [ie it could be illegal as 25 euros is worth less than 25 pounds, so if the prices are in pounds there could be a case for 'bait-and-switch'].
So I clicked on the link to check - and got this ...
Yep, the prices were in pounds - but they were from £14.99, not £24.99.
So the email message could have highlighted prices that were significantly lower - and so might have increased responses.
Update: Less than an hour later I got the same email but with the lead price in pounds not euros. But the landing page still had lower prices than the from headline.
The numbers on this don't surprise me - but I would raise the issue of how little emphasis is given to the landing page. In my opinion, if you get everything else right, but the landing page wrong everything fails.
This message from sustainable fashion brand Spilt Milk reflects the nature of the organization ... it helps the unsubscriber leave with a fond memory of the business.
If you've read any of my books, you will know that I use em dashes a lot.
OK, I appreciate that this is about the use of [so-called] martech - but this headline seems to be introducing a brand new idea to business and marketing. Is this another example of marketing jobs being taken by tech folk?
I recently read a ‘paper’ on buyer behaviour and the impact of ai on that behaviour. One of the key questions was: ‘how often do you use ‘generative AI?’ Okay, hands up, how many of you can explain the difference between ai, generative ai and agentic ai? If you can, well done. If you can’t, how could you answer this question.
Unless respondents had to define generative ai before answering - possible, but likely(?) - any findings drawn from the resulting data are deeply flawed. By deeply flawed, I mean useless.
Unless, of course, the organisation doing the research is selling AI services and so might be biased in its conclusions.
I think it’s safe to assume that these failures wouldn’t have happened if ai had not been used?
I needed to know how to repair something in my van. A google search took me to a video on facebook. As the video ended, up popped a message telling me that a friend of mine - 160 miles away - was at a night club. Not a secret. But still ...
So I'm watching a TV programme about canals [on a TV with an outside aerial]. The boat is going over a massive aqueduct in Wales, but I missed its name.
So I opened google on my PC and typed in "aqueduct … " but before I could add 'Wales' the auto-prompt thingy puts in 'Wales'.
I have searched for aqueducts around the UK a number of times ... but why did google know I was looking for that country?
Spooky.
*Younger readers might need to look up "the X Files TV series" 😏
The search was for a very specific type of motorhome; the "Transit Duetto Autosleeper". In the result, the first two ads are for campervans - which are different to motorhomes - and none are for 'Transit', 'Duetto' or 'Autosleeper'.
So the search was refined, adding the make of the motorhome. "Ford Transit Duetto Autosleeper" produced the following return ...
I wanted some information on the wiring of my van, and so entered a relevant search into Google ... and got this ai-generated response. Note the 'typically'. I know what vehicle wiring colours are typically, but my enquiry was for specific information. Ho hum.
In the world of ai, the word ‘agents’ is a replacement for the word ‘bots’*. And ‘bots’ is short for 'robots'.
So when you read the word ‘agents’, think: robots.
*Kudos to the marketer who thought of the rebrand.
Soooooo, I was reading a social media article on a subject that interested me ... but the writing seemed a little clunky therefore it was no surprise when at the end of the article I read the following:
"Since you didn’t include specific instructions with this text I have gone ahead and rewritten it into a punchy scannable format based on our previous tasks. Would you like me to generate some alternative headlines for this story or perhaps condense it down even further?"
The lesson gained from this is that if you're going to use ai software to write your articles, you should really edit them before publishing them.
It's also very classy ... which reflects the experience you get at the actual place.
So I was looking for something to do in Scarborough [Yorkshire, England], and this is what Google advised. The first four were fine ... the other 'local activities' weren't even on the same continent. Ho hum.
After analysing 6 million social media posts related to the [World Cup] tournament's group stage, FIFA's Social Media Protection Service reported 89,000 abusive social media posts with over 10% involving racial abuse.*
If you had paid for ads on social media pages related to football - your ad could have appeared alongside any of these 89,000 abusive posts.
*Source: widely reported in all media, from original post in Instagram by Gianni Infantino [@gianni_infantino] June 2026.
"Your newest competitors aren’t other brands said the article's title". Its promo went on to say that; [the author] "... reframes modern B2B competition by detailing how AI answers intercept buyers long before they ever visit your website."
Well, it worked with me - so I followed the link to the article - which still presented itself as being about B2B.
Except that it wasn't: it was about marketing software to businesses.
Now ... the advice in the article might have been very good for SaaS companies.
But for pretty much every other B2B market, the advice was nonsense.
Source: Similarweb, X, July 21, 2026 @Similarweb.
https://www.similarweb.com/corp/reports/
I'm not sure what 'how do you discover new products?' means ... so I'm not sure the respondents did either [eg does it mean a completely new product you've never heard of, or a product that is new from a different supplier that you already know?]
Either way, the results are interesting in that the top two are non-digital - and good old search engines [you know, those things that ai has killed off] is the third option.
I received this email on my email address - obviously it was for someone else with the same name. The footer on the email read:
"This message and any attached files are intended for the exclusive use of the recipient(s) to whom it is addressed, and may contain information that is potentially personal and/or confidential and/or protected by applicable copyright law. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, please be advised that you have received it in error and are hereby notified that any dissemination, duplication, publication to third parties or other use, in whole or in part, of its content is expressly prohibited. You must immediately notify the sender of this fact, returning the message and deleting it from the respective system.
This communication is for use by the intended recipient and contains information that may be privileged, confidential or copyrighted under applicable law. If you are not the intended recipient, you are hereby formally notified that any use, copying or distribution of this e-mail, in whole or in part, is strictly prohibited. Please notify the sender by return e-mail and delete this e-mail from your system."
Note the last sentence - this is what I received when I replied [informing the sender of the error]
"Address not found
Your message wasn't delivered to resultados@xxxxxx.pt because the address couldn't be found or is unable to receive email."
Obviously written by the legal department, I find the whole thing offensive because it is instructing - and threatening - me over a mistake they have made. No 'please' or 'apologies for the inconvenience'. I'm not even sure the legal threats are valid. After all, they delivered the information to me. It is their fault - can they legally prevent me from using any information found in it.
I rarely use Spotify and so only use the free version - and I accept the ads that come with it. But the other day I had my Marvin Gaye playlist on ... and on came a track I didn't recognise as being on the playlist. Mr Gaye, definitely, but not from my playlist. A little investigation revealed that Spotify had decided to add this track to my playlist as a recommendation. Why? Am I supposed to buy it? Am I supposed to be grateful for being told about a track that I had - presumably - rejected for my Marvin Gaye list. All it did was annoy me and lower my opinion of the music service - and so reduce any chance there might have been of me opting for the paid version.
Three issues with this ad;
#1 Note that this suggests that any advice will be based on human experience, and yet #2 warns us that ai can make mistakes. And finally, #3 ... over a million impressions. Wowcher!
... so I wish I'd written this - 5 questions to ask AI vendors before you buy anything. It is very good. I seriously doubt that any business that has bought-into ai asked these questions.
OK, so it does say 'discover new sellers ...' but it also says '... that you will love'. Well, why would I love these when I have never, ever, bought anything like these products before. Indeed, one is for women's clothes.
#1 It's doing nothing for my user experience,
#2 It's doing nothing for those folk who are paying for these ads to appear in front of me, and
#3 I've bought hundreds of products from ebay since 2003 - surely they could use that buying history to deliver ads for products I might have at least some interested in?
Nearly all of the 'ad spend well spent?' examples on this blog come from X - so what do you think of X's ad for it's own ads?
Only West Ham fans would buy a West Ham shirt - why advertise it to anyone else? Particularly someone who's X profile tells the software which football team he supports [and it's not West Ham]. Ho hum.
It's a little thing, but it bugs me because it makes things messy, but ...
If you leave gaps in your URLs like this:
https://www.salsify.com/hubfs/2026/Salsify 2026 Consumer Research Executive Summary.pdf
when you copy it and paste it into another format that doesn't like spaces [eg word or gmail], it comes out like this ...
https://www.salsify.com/hubfs/2026/Salsify%202026%20Consumer%20Research%20Executive%20Summary.pdf
I have no problem with the advice offered in Avoid all-caps headlines - mainly because folk like me were saying pretty much the same over 20 years ago.
And that's why I have included it here ... to emphasise that spending an hour or so going through the older entries on this blog will be worth your while because a lot of the stuff is still relevant today.
The article also talks about seeking new markets and customers as if that’s a revolutionary digital concept - and not part of Marketing Strategy 101.
I got this email from my broadband provider. Helpful, you might think - except that I have already activated the protection offered. Surely BT's various software talks to each other?
If you was a business owner ... would you like your ads to appear on a platform that boasts that it lets users make AI images from public Instagram profile pics? Read the story on the BBC.
A doctor explains that using peptides without medical supervision is unsafe and discusses the associated risks. He outlines specific questions to ask a specialty provider who is offering peptides to reduce your risk of side effects or poor outcomes.
But let's get back to the advertising issue. On the ad it says in very small print 'for laboratory use only'. So, if it is really* for laboratory use only then the ad is targeted at folk who are using this stuff for laboratory research, wouldn't it be easy to get a list of those labs - there can't be that many - and contact them directly?
Having said that, if the sellers are trying to find individuals who are willing to jeopardise their health by listening to influencers and take this stuff ... well maybe scattergun advertising makes sense?
* Or are those 4 words a legal get-out clause? Would labs really be interested in a retail price with discount for using crypto?
In days gone by I did many website 'audits' ... this is the sort of thing I would find.
Bought some shoes. Didn't fit. Completed online form. No quibble. Produced label for return postage [which I had to print, the only negative]. No charge for return shipping. Email confirming receipt. Then this email.
I wanted some laces for my Adidas Samba Supers. I've worn these for around 45 years so I knew exactly what I wanted. I put into eBay search my specific requirements: "Black Laces Waxed - Round,140cm 2mm".
And this was the first sponsored [advert] return.
My guess is that the seller bid on [ie 'bought'] the key words "laces" and "round". True, I wanted round laces, but I wanted black, not brown; 2mm, not 2.5; 140cm not 75.
Furthermore, the next three sponsored listings were similar in their generic listings for laces.
Ho hum.
It was reported that Meta spent over $70B on this total failure. Maybe if they had asked some normal human beings if they thought it was a good idea and whether they would be happy to use it [no and no].
I do like it when websites ask for your email address and then present an 'email friendly' keyboard 👏
Yes, this is just some personal information from my iPad - which I ignored - but just consider how much data storage is used up with similarly useless stats about all aspects of business and marketing 🤔
Rather than show an ad that is irrelevant to the vast majority of folk who might see it, I would have thought the advertiser [I've included its description below the ad] could have contacted directly those organisations that might be interested in their offering 🤔
Nothing. Ever.
And this is why ...
Who has ever used 'clothe' as a singular noun for clothes?
And there is no way that putting a comma after 'morning' makes any sense whatsoever. I despair.
